We’ll be doing some major maintenance and updates today (May 29, 2026) through Monday (June 1, 2026). Accessibility will be mostly unaffected but periodic periods of downtime may be experienced.
Category: News
-
Michigan 2026 Second Amendment Bills and Firearm News
Current Landscape of Michigan Firearm Laws
Michigan’s Constitution, Article 1, Section 6, states: “Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.” Despite this, the state maintains a permitting system for concealed carry under the 1927 Pistol Licensing Act. Law-abiding citizens must obtain a Concealed Pistol License (CPL) involving training, background checks, and fees. Open carry is generally allowed without a permit, subject to restrictions.
Recent years saw significant changes. In 2023, Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed a package of gun safety measures, including universal background checks, safe storage requirements, and Michigan’s “red flag” law (Extreme Risk Protection Orders, or ERPOs). These took effect in 2024. Firearm registration applies to handguns, and purchasers often need a permit to purchase or a CPL.
Gun violence statistics underscore the stakes. Michigan averages over 1,400 gun deaths annually, though homicide rates have declined in recent years according to some reports. Proponents of restrictions cite this as evidence for further measures; opponents argue that law-abiding citizens’ rights should not be curtailed in response to criminal activity.
Pro-Second Amendment Legislation: The Push for Constitutional Carry
The most prominent development in 2026 is the introduction of House Bills 5653 – 5657, sponsored primarily by Rep. Mike Hoadley (R-Au Gres) and supported by colleagues including Reps. Joseph Fox, James DeSana, Jay DeBoyer, and others. Introduced in early March 2026, this package aims to establish “constitutional carry,” making Michigan the 30th state to allow permitless concealed carry for individuals legally permitted to possess firearms.
• HB 5653 repeals certain provisions in the Michigan Penal Code tied to concealed carry restrictions.
• Companion bills (HB 5655 – 5657) update statutes to prevent penalties for lawful carry without a permit and ensure consistency across laws, including corrections code references.
• Permits would still be available and useful for reciprocity when traveling out of state.
Supporters argue the current system treats a constitutional right as a privilege, imposing unnecessary barriers like training mandates and fees. Rep. Hoadley stated: “The Second Amendment is exceptionally clear… Requiring an American citizen to have a permit… is outrageous.” The bills were referred to the House Judiciary Committee.
As of May 2026, the bills await further action. Passage in the House is plausible given Republican support, but prospects in the Democratic Senate appear dim without compromise. If enacted, the change would align Michigan with the majority of states that have adopted permitless carry, potentially increasing lawful carry among responsible citizens while maintaining prohibitions for felons and others.
Related efforts include earlier 2025 bills like those lowering the CPL application age or clarifying licensing, reflecting sustained Republican interest in easing restrictions.
Efforts to Repeal or Modify Red Flag Laws
Republicans continue challenging the 2023 Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) law. A package introduced in 2025 by Rep. James DeSana seeks repeal, arguing it violates due process and Second Amendment rights by allowing ex parte orders that temporarily remove firearms without an initial hearing.
Usage data shows growth: 391 complaints in the first year (2024), rising 31% to over 500 filings in 2025. Supporters view this as evidence of effectiveness in preventing harm; critics highlight risks of abuse and insufficient due process safeguards. Repeal faces strong opposition in the Senate and from Gov. Whitmer.
Gun Control Proposals: Expanding Restrictions
Democrats and gun violence prevention organizations, including GIFFORDS, have introduced a broad slate of bills in early 2026 to strengthen regulations. These include:
• Gun Dealer Licensing (HB 5065/5066, SB 853/854): Requires state licenses, training, liability insurance, and accountability for sales to prohibited persons.
• High-Capacity Magazine Ban (HB 5750, SB 851): Prohibits magazines holding more than 10 rounds.
• Bump Stock Ban (SB 224, HB 5751): Targets devices enhancing semiautomatic fire rates.
• Waiting Period (HB 5743, SB 848): Three-day delay between purchase and acquisition.
• Mandatory Safety Training and Age 21 Purchase Minimum: For all firearm buyers.
• Expanded Gun-Free Zones (HB 5741/5742, SB 849/850): Adds libraries, capitol grounds, and state buildings; closes open-carry loopholes.
• PLCAA Repeal Efforts: Allowing lawsuits against firearm manufacturers for crimes committed with their products.
These measures reflect a public health approach to gun violence. GIFFORDS urged passage, noting falling homicide rates as proof that “commonsense gun laws save lives.” However, with divided government, many face uphill battles in the House.
Additional proposals target “ghost guns,” drive-by shooting penalties, and local authority over government buildings.
Broader Firearm News and Context
Michigan courts and law enforcement continue implementing existing laws. Legal updates, such as those affirming stops based on observed concealed carry bulges, highlight enforcement realities.
Nationally, post-Bruen (2022) Second Amendment jurisprudence influences state debates, with ongoing challenges to various restrictions. Michigan-specific litigation and federal developments, like veterans’ rights protections, add layers.
Public sentiment remains split. Gun rights groups host events like “Michigan Defenders of the 2nd Amendment,” while prevention advocates emphasize suicide prevention, domestic violence, and community safety. Economic aspects, including dealer regulations and industry liability, also feature prominently.
Firearm ownership and training remain popular. Elective firearm safety courses in schools and private training reflect responsible ownership culture alongside policy fights.
Outlook for the Remainder of 2026
With the legislative session ongoing, outcomes depend on negotiation and public pressure. Constitutional carry could advance if momentum builds in the House and finds Senate moderates. Gun control packages may see partial movement or stall amid partisan lines. Red flag repeal appears unlikely without broader shifts.
Voters will ultimately influence direction through 2026 elections. Candidates’ stances on these issues, including potential gubernatorial races, will shape the debate. Michigan’s strong constitutional provision and diverse population position it as a bellwether for balancing rights and safety.
Stakeholders on all sides emphasize lawful ownership and reducing violence. Whether through expanded rights or tighter rules, 2026 legislation will significantly impact how Michiganders exercise Second Amendment freedoms for years to come.
-
Wisconsin 2026 Second Amendment Bills and Firearm News
In 2026, Wisconsin remained a battleground for Second Amendment issues, reflecting the state’s divided political landscape. With a Republican-controlled Legislature and Democratic Governor Tony Evers, gun rights expansion efforts advanced in committees but faced significant hurdles, while gun safety proposals largely stalled. The 2025-2026 legislative session highlighted ongoing tensions between individual rights and public safety concerns amid national debates influenced by U.S. Supreme Court precedents like New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen(2022).
As of mid-2026, Wisconsin continued to allow open carry for adults 18 and older who are not prohibited possessors, with concealed carry requiring a permit involving background checks and training. No major statewide changes to these core laws took effect in 2026, but several high-profile bills generated substantial debate and media attention. Firearm-related news also covered gun shows, safety initiatives, and broader violence prevention efforts.
This article examines key legislative proposals, their status, stakeholder perspectives, and related firearm developments in Wisconsin during 2026.
Permitless Concealed Carry: Assembly Bill 609
One of the most prominent Second Amendment-focused bills was Assembly Bill 609 (AB 609), introduced in late 2025 by Rep. Chanz Green (R-Grand View) and cosponsored by several Republicans. The bill sought to eliminate the requirement for a concealed carry license in Wisconsin, effectively enacting “constitutional carry” or permitless carry for eligible adults.
Under current law, individuals must obtain a license from the Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ), which includes a background check and safety training. AB 609 would have repealed much of this framework while preserving the option for voluntary licensing to facilitate reciprocity with other states and comply with federal restrictions, such as gun-free school zones. It also proposed adjustments like reducing the distance restriction for hunting near schools and hospitals from 1,700 to 1,200 feet and modifying prohibitions on carrying in certain locations.
Supporters, including the National Rifle Association (NRA) and Wisconsin Firearm Owners, Inc., argued that permitting requirements impose unnecessary bureaucratic burdens on a constitutional right. They noted that 29 other states had adopted similar measures without significant increases in crime. Rep. Green emphasized that “rights do not require permit slips from the government” and that criminals ignore such laws.
Opponents, including Moms Demand Action, the Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence, and the Wisconsin Professional Police Association, raised concerns about removing training and background check requirements for concealed carry. They cited potential risks to public safety and law enforcement encounters. Research referenced in hearings suggested possible increases in officer-involved shootings in permitless carry states.
The bill received a public hearing in the Assembly Committee on State Affairs in January 2026 but ultimately failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1 on March 23, 2026, as the legislative session concluded without full enactment. Governor Evers had vetoed similar measures previously, signaling likely opposition.
Proposed Constitutional Amendment for Stronger Protections
Parallel to AB 609, lawmakers advanced Assembly Joint Resolution 112 (AJR 112), which proposed amending Article I, Section 25 of the Wisconsin Constitution. The current provision states that people “have the right to keep and bear arms for security, defense, hunting, recreation or any other lawful purpose,” describing it as “fundamental, but… not absolute.”
The resolution sought to declare the right “inalienable” and “without qualification,” subjecting any restrictions to “strict scrutiny”—a high legal standard requiring a compelling state interest and narrow tailoring. This would elevate protections beyond the current framework and align more closely with expansive interpretations of the Second Amendment.
Because constitutional amendments require passage in two consecutive legislative sessions followed by voter approval, AJR 112 represented a long-term strategy. It advanced through committee hearings in early 2026 but did not complete the full process by session’s end. Proponents viewed it as safeguarding against future restrictions, while critics worried it could limit reasonable regulations.
Democratic Gun Safety Proposals and Stalemate
Democrats reintroduced several gun control measures, including expanded background checks for private sales, a 48-hour waiting period for handgun purchases, extreme risk protection orders (red flag laws), and restrictions on “ghost guns.” These faced strong Republican opposition and largely failed to advance beyond introduction or committee stages.
A notable example was Senate Bill 1046 (SB 1046), which aimed to require state permits for firearms dealers selling at least five guns per year, alongside other transaction and safety provisions. Introduced by Democrats, it sought enhanced oversight but saw limited traction.
Bipartisan efforts remained challenging. A group called Bridge the Divide Now proposed eight moderate measures—such as safe storage incentives, voluntary self-prohibition options, and targeted violence prevention—intended to appeal across aisles. While gaining media attention in early 2026, these did not translate into passed legislation amid partisan gridlock.
Other Firearm-Related Legislation and Developments
Additional bills included proposals for tax exemptions on gun safes to promote safe storage and restrictions around polling places. Broader session activity saw minimal enacted changes to core firearm laws.
Federally, Wisconsin gun owners benefited indirectly from national developments, such as Veterans’ Second Amendment Protections in appropriations packages, adding due process for VA fiduciary reporting. No major federal assault weapon bans or similar measures directly impacted the state in 2026.
Gun shows remained popular, with events scheduled throughout the year in locations like Eagle River, Monroe, and Jefferson County, serving as hubs for enthusiasts and vendors.
Stakeholder Perspectives and Broader Context
Gun rights organizations praised Republican efforts to reduce government involvement in lawful carry, framing them as restorations of constitutional freedoms. Law enforcement groups expressed mixed views, with some opposing permitless carry due to operational concerns.
Public health and violence prevention advocates highlighted Wisconsin’s firearm death rates and pushed for evidence-based safety measures. Data from groups like Everytown Research noted the state’s middling rankings on gun safety policies.
The debate occurred against a backdrop of national Bruen-era litigation and state-level experiments with permitless carry. Wisconsin’s status as a swing state amplified the visibility of these discussions.
Outlook for Future Sessions
With the 2025-2026 session ending without landmark changes, Second Amendment advocates plan to reintroduce strengthened carry and constitutional provisions in 2027. Democrats will likely continue advocating for safety enhancements. Governor Evers’ position remains a key veto gate for pro-carry bills.
Voters may ultimately decide on constitutional amendments, providing a direct voice on the scope of gun rights. In the interim, Wisconsin maintains its balance of robust open carry traditions with regulated concealed carry, reflecting ongoing negotiations between liberty and responsibility.
-
Ohio 2026 Second Amendment Bills and Firearm News
Recent Enacted Laws Strengthening Gun Rights
Several significant bills signed into law in 2025 have already reshaped Ohio’s firearm landscape. Senate Bill 58, signed by Governor Mike DeWine in January 2025, enacts the Second Amendment Financial Privacy Act. It prohibits state or local requirements for firearm liability insurance or fees tied to possession, while barring the creation of a state firearm registry. Proponents hail it as a safeguard against financial burdens and government overreach on lawful owners.
House Bill 452 expanded self-defense protections, granting immunity from both criminal prosecution and civil lawsuits for individuals using force to protect themselves or others in certain scenarios, including guests at nonprofits like churches. This builds on Ohio’s “stand your ground” framework and was incorporated into broader workplace violence prevention measures.
Ohio’s concealed handgun licensing system remains operational despite permitless carry. The Attorney General’s 2025 report noted 77,159 permits issued that year, underscoring continued interest in formal credentials for reciprocity and other benefits.
Key Pending and Advanced Bills in 2026
Senate Bill 278 (Sponsored by Sen. Terry Johnson, R-McDermott) represents a major push to enforce state firearms preemption. Passed by the Ohio Senate on April 15, 2026, along partisan lines, the bill amends Ohio Revised Code Section 9.68 to allow individuals or organizations to seek punitive or exemplary damages against municipalities enacting gun regulations stricter than state law. It also permits recovery of attorney fees and court costs.
Senate President Rob McColley (R-Napoleon) argued the measure protects lawful Second Amendment exercise from “overzealous municipalities.” Critics, including Democratic leaders and city officials from Columbus and Cincinnati, contend it undermines home rule authority and could deter local efforts on safe storage to prevent child access incidents. As of mid-May 2026, the bill had been referred to the House Judiciary Committee.
Senate Bill 214, passed by the Senate 31-1 in March 2026, seeks to remove firearm suppressors (silencers) from the definition of “dangerous ordnance.” Sponsored to ease regulatory burdens on hearing protection and hunting, the bill advances to the House for further consideration. Supporters note alignment with federal trends toward suppressor deregulation.
Senate Bill 303 (also sponsored by Sen. Terry Johnson) would allow 18- to 20-year-olds to purchase handguns from federally licensed dealers, provided they are not otherwise prohibited. Referred to committee in late 2025, the bill addresses perceived inconsistencies in age restrictions for long guns versus handguns and prepares for potential federal shifts. It has drawn support from groups like the Buckeye Firearms Association.
House Bill 382, the Second Amendment Protection Act (introduced by Rep. Tex Fischer and others), aims to prohibit state and local agencies from enforcing certain federal firearm regulations deemed unconstitutional. It includes provisions for permitless concealed carry enhancements for qualifying adults and civil penalties for violations. The bill remains in committee but reflects broader “sanctuary” efforts against federal overreach.
Other notable proposals include Rep. Jennifer Gross’s (R-West Chester) legislation for a sales tax exemption on firearm safety devices (gun safes, locks), introduced in February 2025 with bipartisan cosponsorship to encourage responsible ownership. Sen. Al Cutrona (R-Canfield) has pushed the Freedom to Carry Act, seeking to lower the concealed carry license age to 18 and ease long-gun transport rules.
Broader Context and Firearm Landscape
Ohio maintains strong baseline protections: no assault weapon bans, no magazine capacity limits, open carry without restriction for those not otherwise prohibited, and constitutional carry for qualifying adults 21 and older. Firearms are not subject to registration or licensing for possession.
Ongoing court battles involve cities like Columbus defending safe storage ordinances against state preemption challenges. The Ohio Supreme Court has allowed appeals on related injunctions, highlighting persistent local-state friction.
Advocacy groups such as the NRA-ILA, Buckeye Firearms Association, and Gun Owners of America actively track and support these measures. In the 2026 primary context, endorsements emphasized pro-Second Amendment candidates.
Public safety debates continue, with Democrats and some local leaders advocating measures like mandatory safe storage to reduce accidental shootings involving children, while Republicans prioritize uniform state law and individual rights.
Outlook for the Remainder of 2026
With the General Assembly returning after May primaries, momentum favors further pro-Second Amendment advancements, particularly on preemption enforcement (SB 278), suppressors (SB 214), and youth handgun purchases (SB 303). Governor DeWine’s past actions suggest measured support for rights expansions without broad opposition to core reforms.
These developments position Ohio among states expanding gun owner liberties amid national Second Amendment litigation at the U.S. Supreme Court. Stakeholders on all sides will monitor House action and potential gubernatorial review closely. Law-abiding citizens benefit from reduced burdens, while debates over local autonomy and safety persist.
Ohio’s 2026 legislative session underscores a commitment to viewing the right to keep and bear arms as fundamental. As bills progress, they will shape the balance between individual liberties, public safety, and governmental authority for years to come.
-
Delaware 2026 Second Amendment Bills and Firearm News
Recent Legislative and Judicial Developments
Delaware has enacted several significant gun control measures in recent years. In 2022, the state passed an assault weapons ban and high-capacity magazine restrictions, alongside efforts to raise the purchase age for many firearms from 18 to 21. However, a notable judicial setback occurred in September 2025 when a Kent County Superior Court judge struck down key provisions of House Bill 451, ruling that raising the age limit infringed on the rights of 18- to 20-year-olds under Article I, Section 20 of the Delaware Constitution. This provision explicitly protects the right to keep and bear arms for defense, family, home, state, hunting, and recreational use—language that some argue offers broader protections than the federal Second Amendment.
The ruling restored access for young adults in certain contexts and underscored the state’s constitutional framework as a check on legislative overreach. Gun rights groups, including the Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association and Bridgeville Rifle & Pistol Club, celebrated the decision as a victory for individual liberties.
Another major development is the implementation of the handgun Permit to Purchase law (Senate Bill 2, signed in 2024), which took effect on November 16, 2025. This requires prospective handgun buyers to obtain a state-issued permit involving fingerprinting, background checks, and an eight-hour firearms training course. While proponents view it as a commonsense safety measure, implementation has faced hurdles, including delays in statewide computer systems. Gun shop owners have reported operational frustrations, and legal challenges from rights organizations argue it burdens constitutional rights.
Key Bills in the 2026 Session
The 2026 legislative session, which convened in January, features several firearms-related proposals carrying over from prior years and new initiatives. Democrats are expected to advance an anti-gun agenda, while Republicans introduce protective measures.
Senate Bill 300 (Dealer Licensing and Regulation): This high-profile bill seeks to impose stricter state-level licensing on firearm dealers. Requirements include purchasing a state license (with fees scaled to sales volume), completing bi-annual Delaware State Police training, installing advanced surveillance systems with video storage, and facing enhanced penalties for violations. Sponsored by Senate President Pro Tempore David Sokola, the bill aims to curb illegal trafficking by holding dealers accountable, especially amid perceived federal enforcement rollbacks.
Critics, including gun shop owners and Republican lawmakers, label it an “FFL killer” that could drive small businesses out of operation through costly compliance burdens. It also risks creating elements of a firearms registry via electronic tracking of acquisitions and dispositions. As of mid-May 2026, an amended version (SS1 for SB 300) advanced from the Senate Executive Committee to the Finance Committee, drawing strong opposition from the NRA-ILA and local retailers. A supermajority vote is needed for passage, giving opponents a potential path to block it.
House Bill 418 (Ghost Guns Update): Introduced in May 2026, this bill addresses ongoing litigation over Delaware’s existing ghost gun regulations. It provides a six-month compliance window for individuals who legally possessed unserialized firearms, unfinished frames, or receivers before prior laws took effect. Owners can serialize them through a federally licensed dealer or render them inoperable. The legislation clarifies definitions to align with federal standards while maintaining prohibitions on untraceable firearms.
Supporters argue it modernizes traceability and closes loopholes. Critics contend it burdens lawful hobbyists and home gunsmiths, practices with deep historical roots in American firearm culture. The bill remains in committee as of mid-May.
House Bill 45 and HB 198: These carryover bills reflect broader concerns. HB 45 would mandate a new merchant category code for credit/debit transactions at gun retailers, potentially enabling tracking of lawful purchases. HB 198 seeks to extend the duration of protection orders (often linked to red flag concerns) beyond two years.
Republican-Backed Protections (e.g., HB 240): Republicans, including Rep. Shannon Morris, have introduced measures to safeguard uniform Second Amendment rights, countering what they see as overregulation. These efforts emphasize preemption of local restrictions and protections for veterans and lawful owners.
Other proposals, such as SB 204 on local firearm storage rules and discussions around school safety (e.g., allowing trained private school staff to carry), indicate a multifaceted debate.
Broader Context and Stakeholder Perspectives
Delaware’s gun laws already include universal background checks, assault weapon prohibitions, red flag provisions, and restrictions on certain accessories. Advocates like Everytown for Gun Safety and Brady United praise these as life-saving, citing examples of trafficking and youth access. Gun rights supporters, including the NRA and local associations, argue that criminals bypass laws and that regulations disproportionately affect law-abiding citizens, hunters, and recreational shooters.
Economic impacts are notable. Firearm retailers face rising compliance costs, potentially leading to higher prices or business closures. Rural areas, where hunting and self-defense play key roles, often voice stronger opposition. Court challenges remain a critical tool, as seen with the age-21 ruling and permit law lawsuits.
Public safety data and enforcement challenges add complexity. While Delaware reports issues with illegal guns in urban areas like Wilmington, tracing studies show many originate from out-of-state or secondary markets. Implementation delays for the permit system highlight administrative burdens on state agencies.
Outlook for the Remainder of 2026
With the legislative session ongoing through spring and early summer, the fate of these bills depends on committee hearings, floor votes, and gubernatorial action under Gov. Matt Meyer. A divided political environment—Democrats holding majorities but facing supermajority hurdles for some measures—suggests compromise or stalemate is possible. Federal developments, including potential shifts under the Trump administration, may influence state-level momentum.
Gun owners are urged to engage through advocacy groups, contacting legislators, and monitoring bills via the Delaware General Assembly website. As debates continue, Delaware’s approach will likely reflect national divides: prioritizing regulation for safety versus robust constitutional protections.
In summary, 2026 marks another pivotal year for Second Amendment issues in Delaware. From dealer regulations and ghost gun updates to judicial affirmations of rights, the state’s firearm landscape remains dynamic. Stakeholders on all sides emphasize the need for balanced, effective policies that respect both safety and liberty.
-
Maryland 2026 Second Amendment Bills and Firearm News
Overview of the Legislative Session
Maryland’s 2026 session saw a mix of gun control measures advance while pro-Second Amendment proposals largely stalled. Governor Wes Moore, a Democrat, faced decisions on passed bills amid a politically divided landscape. Firearm-related legislation reflected national debates over “ghost guns,” auto-sears (Glock switches), and industry accountability, even as crime statistics and legal challenges, including federal court rulings upholding certain restrictions, shaped the discourse.
Gun rights organizations like the NRA-ILA and Maryland Shall Issue criticized many proposals as overly broad attacks on lawful owners. Advocacy groups such as Everytown for Gun Safety and Moms Demand Action praised efforts to curb illegal conversions and violence.
Key Passed or Pending Bills: Focus on Convertible Pistols
The most significant measure was SB 334 / HB 577, which prohibits the manufacture, sale, purchase, or transfer of “machine gun convertible pistols” effective in 2027. These are defined as semi-automatic handguns, particularly certain Glock models with cruciform trigger bars, that can be easily modified with illegal auto-sears or switches to fire automatically.
Supporters argued the bill targets a growing threat from DIY machine guns used in crimes, holding manufacturers accountable by requiring designs resistant to simple conversions. Amendments added exemptions for family transfers, inheritance, and repairs. The bill passed both chambers and went to Governor Moore for signature.
Critics, including gun rights groups, contended the language was vague and could encompass common handguns like older Glocks, punishing responsible owners for criminals’ actions. Conversion devices are already illegal under federal law. They warned of impacts on legal sales and potential overreach by the Maryland State Police in publishing prohibited lists.
SB 775, another bill with the Governor, mandates permanent destruction of all firearms and parts surrendered in state buyback programs, preventing resale or redistribution.
Failed or Stalled Proposals
Several restrictive measures did not advance fully:
• Excise Tax Bills (HB 197 / SB 118): Proposed an 11% additional tax on firearms, ammunition, and accessories to fund violence prevention. Opponents labeled it a “sin tax” that burdens lawful owners and could reduce conservation funding from hunting-related sales.
• Handgun Roster Reform (SB 830 / HB 1339): Would have granted the Attorney General broad authority to review and remove models from Maryland’s approved handgun roster, including retroactive changes. This faced strong opposition and did not reach the Governor.
• Gun Theft Felony Act (HB 863): Sought to elevate firearm theft to a felony with enhanced penalties. It stalled despite support from some rights groups.
• Waiting period exemptions, constitutional carry attempts (e.g., HB 1417), and lead ammunition phase-outs also saw limited success or defeat.
Bills providing clearer guidance on carry laws, such as a handbook requirement (HB 303), garnered some bipartisan interest but reflected broader frustrations with Maryland’s complex permitting system.
Broader Firearm News and Context in Maryland
Maryland continues to enforce strict regulations, including its handgun permit system, assault weapons ban (upheld in prior years), and sensitive-place restrictions. A January 2026 Fourth Circuit ruling affirmed many of these measures, providing a legal backdrop for the session.
Gun violence remains a concern, with data showing firearms involved in a majority of homicides and suicides. Advocates push for prevention funding, while rural and suburban counties—some with Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions—resist further restrictions.
Retail and industry impacts are notable. Maryland’s handgun roster and waiting periods already limit options compared to neighboring states. Proposed changes could affect dealers, manufacturers, and owners, particularly with rising interest in compliant firearms amid national trends.
Implications for Gun Owners and Future Outlook
For Maryland residents, the 2026 outcomes mean continued compliance burdens. Lawful owners of potentially affected pistols should monitor State Police regulations and grandfathering provisions. The session underscored partisan divides: Democratic majorities advanced safety-focused bills, while Republican and rights advocates emphasized enforcement against criminals over new owner restrictions.
Looking ahead, post-session bill signings by Governor Moore will clarify the final landscape. Legal challenges under Bruenand subsequent cases may test new laws. Gun owners are advised to stay informed via resources like the Maryland State Police, attorney general handbooks (if enacted), and organizations tracking compliance.
Maryland’s 2026 session reinforced its reputation for progressive gun policy while highlighting persistent debates over effectiveness versus rights. As implementation unfolds, balancing public safety with constitutional protections will remain central to ongoing discussions.
-
Virginia 2026 Second Amendment Bills and Developments
The 2026 Virginia General Assembly Session
In the 2026 Virginia General Assembly session, Democrats leveraged full control of the governorship and both legislative chambers following the 2025 elections to advance an ambitious package of gun measures. Governor Abigail Spanberger, a far left Democrat and former CIA officer, signed more than two dozen firearms-related bills into law between March and April 2026. Most provisions take effect on July 1, 2026, with several carrying emergency clauses for immediate implementation. This legislative effort represented the most significant expansion of gun regulations in Virginia in over a decade, shifting the Commonwealth from a historically permissive stance on firearms to one aligned with stricter national models in leftist run states.
Governor Spanberger and the Assault on Semiautomatic Firearms
A flashpoint of the 2026 session centered on Governor Spanberger’s handling of legislation targeting semiautomatic firearms. House Bill 217 and Senate Bill 749, which she ultimately signed with amendments, prohibit the future manufacture, importation, sale, purchase, or transfer of designated “assault firearms.” These are defined primarily as certain semiautomatic centerfire rifles and pistols capable of accepting detachable magazines, often featuring military-style characteristics such as pistol grips, folding or adjustable stocks, or threaded barrels. The measures also ban magazines capable of holding more than 15 rounds.
Critics, including gun rights organizations, argued that the governor’s amendments broadened the scope in ways that effectively outlawed many common semiautomatic firearms relied upon for self-defense, hunting, and sport shooting. By refining definitions around detachable magazines and specific configurations, opponents claimed the changes removed protections for a wider array of popular semiautomatic rifles and pistols, going beyond initial proposals. Spanberger countered that her amendments provided essential clarity for law enforcement and gun owners while explicitly safeguarding certain traditional semiautomatic shotguns used for hunting. Lawful owners who possessed qualifying firearms or magazines before July 1, 2026, are grandfathered and may continue to keep them, though future transfers are restricted. Violations constitute Class 1 misdemeanors and trigger a three-year prohibition on firearm possession.
This action by the governor drew intense scrutiny, with those on the left hailing it as a necessary restriction on “weapons of war” in civilian hands, while detractors viewed it as a de facto assault on semiautomatic technology—the most prevalent type of firearm in America.
Assault Weapons and High-Capacity Magazine Restrictions
Building on the governor’s semiautomatic-focused measures, the core assault weapons provisions in House Bill 217 and Senate Bill 749 established the prospective ban detailed above. The legislation uses feature-based definitions to identify covered firearms. Governor Spanberger’s amendments clarified enforcement protocols and carved out exemptions for certain hunting shotguns, aiming to mitigate impacts on rural and sporting communities while advancing public safety objectives.
Raising Purchase Age and Restoring Background Checks
House Bill 1525 increased the minimum purchase age for handguns and assault-style firearms from 18 to 21, closing the so-called “Lynchburg loophole.” It also directed the Virginia State Police to resume universal background checks on private transfers. An emergency clause rendered these changes effective immediately in April 2026.
Safe Storage and Child Access Prevention
House Bill 871 and Senate Bill 348 mandate secure storage of firearms in homes where minors or prohibited persons are present, with flexibility for trigger locks. House Bill 110 addresses visible handguns in vehicles.
Gun-Free Zones and Location-Based Restrictions
Bills such as House Bill 1524, Senate Bill 727, and House Bill 626 expanded prohibited carry areas in public spaces, state buildings, hospitals, and near polling places.
Ghost Guns, Industry Accountability, and Domestic Violence
House Bill 40 banned unserialized ghost guns. House Bill 21 held firearm industry members to standards of responsible conduct. Domestic violence measures in House Bill 19, House Bill 93, and House Bill 1015 strengthened prohibitions and relinquishment requirements.
Reactions and Legal Outlook
Those from the left praised the package, including the governor’s actions on semiautomatic restrictions, as a milestone for reducing mass shootings and gun violence. The NRA and Virginia gun rights groups condemned the semiautomatic-focused bans as unconstitutional, launching immediate legal challenges citing Second Amendment violations.
Virginia’s Evolving Gun Landscape
As mid-2026 implementation proceeds, retailers note surging demand for compliant firearms and storage options. Virginia’s 2026 session, marked by the governor’s prominent role in restricting many semiautomatic models, highlights the state’s political evolution and positions it as a key testing ground for gun policy. The long-term effects on violence rates, legal challenges, and electoral consequences continue to unfold.
-
North Carolina 2026 Second Amendment Bills
The primary Second Amendment-related focus in North Carolina’s 2026 short session (which began April 21, 2026) is Senate Bill 50 (S50, “Freedom to Carry NC”), along with a few other bills from the 2025-2026 session.
North Carolina holds short sessions in even-numbered years, primarily to address vetoed bills from the prior long session, budget matters, and limited new introductions.
Key Pro-2A / Permitless Carry Bill: S50 (“Freedom to Carry NC”)
• Summary: This bill would allow permitless concealed carry (constitutional carry) for individuals 18+ who are legally eligible to possess a firearm. It eliminates the current requirement for a concealed handgun permit, including safety training and background checks for the permit itself (though other restrictions like prohibited places would remain).
• Status (as of recent updates): Passed both chambers in 2025, vetoed by Gov. Josh Stein. The Senate overrode the veto (30-19) in July 2025. The House has repeatedly delayed or withdrawn the override vote from the calendar (multiple times through early 2026) but placed it on the calendar for April 21, 2026, at the start of the short session. A 3/5 supermajority is needed in the House for a successful override.
• Support/Opposition: Strongly backed by pro-2A groups like the NRA and Republican leadership (e.g., Sen. Phil Berger). Opponents, including law enforcement and gun control advocates, argue it reduces training/safety and could increase risks.
As of mid-May 2026, the override remains pending in the House.
Other Notable Bills
• H470 – Second Amendment Protection Act (introduced 2025): This “nullification”-style bill would prohibit state/local officials from enforcing certain federal firearms laws/regulations deemed to exceed federal authority (e.g., on in-state made firearms/ammo). It includes penalties for violations and exceptions for certain investigations. Status appears stalled in committee.
• S788 (“Guarding Freedoms & Public Safety Act,” introduced April 2026): A more restrictive bill that would:
• Ban firearm possession/purchase by those convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence offenses (Class A1 misdemeanor violation).
• Require universal background checks for private sales/transfers.
• Reinstate the pistol purchase permit law.
• Mandate safe storage certification for parents/guardians of public school students.
• Appropriate funds for enforcement/awareness.
• Early status: Introduced and referred to committee during the short session.
• Other mentions include bills on knife carry expansions, mental health record privacy, and firearm storage clarifications from prior actions, but S50 dominates 2A discussions in 2026.
For the latest official status, check the North Carolina General Assembly website (ncleg.gov) and search bills by number. Pro-2A tracking is available via NRA-ILA, and bill texts/digests provide full details. Laws can change quickly in session, so verify current actions.
-
South Carolina 2026 Second Amendment Bills
South Carolina’s 126th General Assembly (2025-2026) is a two-year session. The 2025 portion adjourned sine die in May 2025, with many bills carrying over to 2026. The 2026 regular session convened in January and was set to adjourn sine die around mid-May 2026 (potentially May 14). South Carolina has strong Second Amendment protections, including constitutional/permitless carry (open and concealed for eligible adults 18+ since the 2024 law).
Key Second Amendment-Related Bills (2026 Activity)
• H.4723 (South Carolina Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act / PLCAA): Sponsored by Rep. Wooten and others. This strengthens protections for firearm manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and trade associations against “qualified civil liability actions” stemming from criminal misuse of firearms or accessories. It reinforces the federal PLCAA framework at the state level to shield lawful commerce. Introduced early 2026; advanced with support from pro-2A groups like NSSF and GOA.
• H.3930 / Related (Second Amendment Financial Privacy Act): Prohibits payment card networks from using special merchant category codes (MCCs) that distinguish firearm/ammunition retailers, prevents government entities from maintaining registries of gun owners via financial data, and includes enforcement by the Attorney General. Passed the House in 2025 and carried over; saw continued momentum in 2026 committees.
• H.3872 (Hunting Heritage Protection Act): Requires the Department of Natural Resources to adopt policies ensuring no net loss of hunting/fishing lands. Passed the House in 2025 (carried over) with strong support; advanced further in 2026 as a pro-hunting/2A heritage measure.
• S.136 / H.136 (Dismissal of Pending Gun Possession Charges): Cleans up pre-constitutional carry charges for unlawful handgun possession. Vetoed by Gov. McMaster but overridden by the legislature (Senate in 2025, House in January 2026). Became law effective January 2026.
Other Notable Measures
• Anti-constitutional carry efforts (e.g., S.145): Attempts to repeal the 2024 permitless carry law. Referred to committee with little to no progress.
• Campus carry expansions (e.g., H.3283, H.5163): Proposals to allow concealed weapons on college campuses under certain conditions. Referred to Judiciary; limited advancement.
• Tax exemptions/sales holidays: Proposals like sales tax breaks for firearms/ammunition (e.g., H.3855, H.4092) referred to Ways & Means.
• Red flag / extreme risk protective orders (e.g., H.3743) and safe storage mandates: Generally stalled in the Republican-controlled legislature.
• Resolutions like H.5070: Symbolic support for the Second Amendment. Introduced but remained in committee.
Outcomes and Context
Pro-2A priorities (industry protections, financial privacy, hunting heritage, and cleanup from constitutional carry) saw the most movement, with carryover bills from 2025 advancing in 2026. Major expansions or restrictions had limited success amid a pro-gun majority. No sweeping rollbacks of rights occurred. The session emphasized reinforcing existing strong laws rather than major overhauls.
For the latest bill texts, statuses, and history, check the official South Carolina Legislature site (scstatehouse.gov), LegiScan, or trackers from NRA-ILA, SC 2nd Amendment groups, or NSSF. Governor McMaster’s office posts signed bills. Watch for any post-sine die special sessions. Similar debates are expected in future cycles.
-
Florida 2026 Second Amendment Bills
Florida’s 2026 Regular Legislative Session ran from January 13 to March 13, 2026 (adjourned sine die). Florida has strong Second Amendment protections, including constitutional carry (permitless concealed carry since 2023) and no magazine capacity limits. A court ruling in 2025 (McDaniels v. State) struck down the state’s open carry ban, creating some uncertainty that lawmakers addressed indirectly.
Key Second Amendment-Related Bills
• SB 52 (Security Services at Places of Worship / Armed Church Security): Sponsored by Sen. Gaetz and others. Exempts volunteer armed security providers at places of worship from professional security licensure requirements. Passed both chambers overwhelmingly and was signed into law (Chapter No. 2026-46). A notable pro-2A success for enhancing security options.
• HB 757 (School Safety / ARMOR Act): Expanded the Guardian Program (armed school staff) to public postsecondary institutions (colleges/universities). Allowed trained faculty/staff to carry on campus under certain conditions. Passed the legislature (with amendments) and headed to the Governor. Faced opposition from some campus groups but advanced as a school safety measure.
• HB 133 (Minimum Age for Long Gun Purchases): Would have lowered the minimum age to purchase rifles/shotguns from 21 back to 18 (reversing a post-Parkland law). Passed the House multiple times in prior years and again in 2026 (74-37), but stalled/died in the Senate Rules Committee. Did not become law.
• HB 1551 / SB 1748 (Firearm Industry Product Liability Protections): Provided legal shields for firearm manufacturers against certain lawsuits related to design features not required by federal law. Passed the House but died in the Senate.
Other Notable Measures
• HB 321 / SB 406 (Carrying Weapons/Firearms in Certain Locations): Responded to the open carry ruling by prohibiting carry in additional sensitive places (e.g., government buildings, schools). Advanced in committees but ultimately died.
• Preemption repeal attempts (e.g., HB 6017, SB 954) by Democrats to allow local gun regulations — died in committee with no traction.
• Other proposals on safe storage, background checks, or further restrictions saw little to no progress in the Republican-controlled legislature.
Outcomes and Context
The session yielded modest pro-2A wins with SB 52 (church security) and HB 757 (campus guardians), while efforts to roll back the long-gun age minimum and provide broader industry protections fell short in the Senate. No major erosions of existing rights occurred. Florida remains one of the stronger shall-issue/constitutional carry states.
For full details, bill texts, and history, visit the official Florida Legislature site, LegiScan, or trackers like NRA-ILA. Governor DeSantis’ actions on signed bills are available via official channels. Pro-2A or gun safety groups often provide session summaries. Expect similar debates in 2027.
-
Georgia 2026 Second Amendment Bills
Georgia’s 2026 Regular Legislative Session ran from January 12/13 to April 2/3, 2026 (adjourned sine die). Georgia maintains strong Second Amendment protections, including constitutional carry (permitless carry for eligible adults since 2022). Pro-2A measures focused on strengthening state preemption over local rules, while some expansions (like suppressors) fell short.
Key Second Amendment-Related Bills
• SB 204 (Firearms Preemption / Local Gun Storage Ban): Sponsored by Sen. Colton Moore (R) and others. This strengthens the state’s firearms preemption law by prohibiting counties and municipalities from regulating firearm storage (e.g., via ordinances, zoning, or resolutions). It directly targeted local rules like Savannah’s ordinance requiring secure storage of guns in unattended vehicles. It includes provisions allowing affected gun owners to sue local governments for violations (with potential damages of at least $25,000 plus attorney fees). Passed the Senate early in the session (32-21, party-line), received final passage before adjournment, and was sent to Governor Brian Kemp. It became the first bill passed in the 2026 session.
• SB 499 (Suppressors / Silencers): Would have removed firearm suppressors from Georgia’s list of “dangerous weapons,” eliminating state-level criminal penalties for possession (while remaining subject to federal NFA regulation). Passed a House committee in March but fell short on the House floor (short by a few votes) and did not advance fully before adjournment.
• HB 79 (Firearm Safe Handling / Tax Credit): Proposed a tax credit (up to ~$300 in some versions) for expenses related to firearm safety training or secure storage devices (gun safes). It advanced in the House in prior efforts but stalled in the Senate during 2026; a revised version focused more on training. Did not pass.
Other Notable Measures
• HB 711 (Rapid-Fire Devices): Aimed to prohibit certain devices that enable rapid fire (e.g., bump stocks or similar) and update definitions of dangerous weapons. Saw some progress but limited overall advancement.
• Gun safety/restriction bills (e.g., from groups like Every Town) were introduced or revived but generally did not gain significant traction in the Republican-controlled legislature.
Outcomes and Context
The session delivered a notable win for preemption advocates with SB 204, reinforcing statewide uniformity on gun laws against local restrictions. However, broader expansions like suppressor deregulation did not succeed. No major rollbacks of existing rights (e.g., constitutional carry) passed.
For official details, bill texts, and exact status, check the Georgia General Assembly website, LegiScan, or other trackers. Governor Kemp’s actions on signed bills can be found on gov.georgia.gov. Pro-2A groups like NRA-ILA monitor these closely and often provide updates. Future sessions (e.g., 2027) may revisit suppressors or tax incentives.
-
Alabama 2026 Second Amendment Bills
The 2026 Alabama Regular Legislative Session ran from January 13 to April 9/10, 2026 (adjourned sine die). Several bills touched on Second Amendment/firearms issues, but most pro-2A measures had limited success. Alabama already has strong gun laws, including constitutional carry (permitless concealed carry for eligible adults since 2023).
Major Second Amendment-Related Bills
• HB 360 (Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday): Sponsored by Rep. Chris Sells (R). This would have created an annual tax exemption (last weekend in August) for firearms (shotguns, rifles, pistols, revolvers), ammunition components (cartridge cases, bullets, primer, gunpowder), silencers, holsters, hearing protection, and related hunting supplies. It passed the House (party-line vote) in late February 2026 and cleared a Senate committee on April 7, but did not receive a floor vote in the Senate before adjournment. It died.
• SB 267 (Reinstating Pistol Carry Permits): Sponsored by Sen. Bobby Singleton (D). This sought to reverse constitutional carry by requiring a permit again for carrying a pistol in a vehicle or concealed on the person, with new criminal penalties. It was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee but saw no further action.
Other Firearms-Related Measures
• HB 420 / Related bills: Increased penalties (to Class A felony) for shooting into occupied schools or buses. These advanced as part of public safety efforts.
• HB 612 (Covington County): Allowed the sheriff to sell abandoned/stolen/unclaimed firearms (constitutional amendment). Passed legislature and headed to ballot.
• SB 156 (Gun Violence Protective Order / Red Flag): Sponsored by Sen. Merika Coleman (D). Would have allowed protective orders restricting firearm possession. Assigned to committee with no hearing reported.
• HB 450: Targeted local restrictions or enforcement in certain cities (Birmingham, Montgomery, Huntsville). Limited progress.
Other proposals (e.g., assault weapon restrictions like HB 206 from prior context) did not advance significantly.
Outcomes and Context
The session prioritized other issues, with Republican-led pro-2A efforts (like the tax holiday) stalling late and Democratic-backed restrictions failing to gain traction. No major expansions or rollbacks of gun rights passed. For full bill texts and history, check the official Alabama Legislature site (ALISON) or trackers like LegiScan/BillTrack50.
Voters may see related constitutional amendments on ballots (e.g., in May 2026 primaries), but none directly altered core 2A rights in 2026. Future sessions could revisit the tax holiday. For the latest, monitor ALISON or NRA-ILA/Alabama-specific trackers.
-
Mississippi 2026 Second Amendment Bills
Be sure to click the link to read the details.
The 2026 Mississippi Regular Legislative Session ran from January 6 to around mid-April 2026 (adjourning sine die on or about April 21).
According to the NRA-ILA, lawmakers considered several measures affecting gun owners, but no anti-Second Amendment legislation passed. The only Second Amendment-related bill enacted was House Bill 1793 (HB 1793).
Key Passed Bill: HB 1793
• Summary: Exempts retail sales of firearm safes from state sales tax during Mississippi’s annual Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday (last weekend in August).
• Effective Date: July 1, 2026.
• This expands the existing tax holiday benefit for firearms and related items to include safes, encouraging secure storage.
Several Other Bills Were Introduced But Did Not Pass Or Died In Committee
• HB 915 (Second Amendment Preservation Act): Aimed to have the state legislature fully preempt local firearms ordinances. Status: Did not pass.
• HB 298 / SB 2081 (and similar): Proposals to allow nonviolent felons to possess/use firearms (often limited to home or vehicle defense) after completing sentences. These died or did not advance.
• HB 664 (Mississippi Firearms Parental Amnesty Act): Provided immunity for parents/guardians voluntarily surrendering a minor’s firearms to law enforcement. Did not pass.
• SB 2710 / related bills: Required charging certain juveniles (under 18) as adults for gun-related crimes and targeted adults providing guns to teens. This passed and takes effect July 1, 2026 — it is more of a tough-on-crime measure than a direct restriction on lawful gun ownership.
• Other proposals (e.g., on hunting restrictions, stolen firearms, or gun shows) generally did not advance to law.
Mississippi remains a strong Second Amendment state with constitutional carry (no permit needed for most adults to carry concealed), few restrictions on lawful ownership, and ongoing protections. The session was relatively quiet on major gun policy changes compared to prior years.
For the full text of bills or exact status, check official sources like the Mississippi Legislature Bill Status site. The next session (2027) is expected to begin in January 2027.
-
Taxation: SBRs, Silencers, and the US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals
Be sure to click the link to read the details.
The Fifth Circuit and the Evolving Battle Over Short-Barreled Rifles, Suppressors, and the National Firearms Act
In the wake of Congress’s decision to eliminate the longstanding $200 tax on National Firearms Act (NFA) items, the legal landscape governing short-barreled rifles (SBRs) and suppressors has shifted dramatically. What was once defended primarily as a revenue-raising measure under Congress’s taxing power now stands exposed to renewed Second Amendment scrutiny. Nowhere has this tension played out more prominently than in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, whose recent rulings and ongoing cases have placed the remaining registration and approval requirements for SBRs and suppressors at the center of a national debate over constitutional limits on firearm regulation.
Background on SBRs and Suppressors
Short-barreled rifles—defined under federal law as rifles with barrels shorter than 16 inches or overall lengths under 26 inches—offer enhanced maneuverability in close-quarters or defensive scenarios. Suppressors, commonly known as silencers, reduce the sound signature of a firearm, protecting hearing and minimizing noise pollution without altering the projectile’s lethality. Both have long been treated as ordinary components of modern sporting and self-defense firearms, yet for nearly a century they have been burdened by the NFA of 1934. The Act imposed a $200 making or transfer tax—equivalent to roughly $4,700 in today’s dollars at enactment—along with mandatory registration, fingerprinting, photographs, and ATF approval. These requirements effectively turned otherwise lawful items into heavily regulated “firearms” subject to felony penalties for noncompliance.
The Elimination of the NFA Tax
That framework rested on the taxing power until January 1, 2026, when the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reduced the NFA tax stamp on suppressors, SBRs, short-barreled shotguns, and certain other items to zero. The elimination of the tax removed the constitutional foundation that had sustained the NFA for decades. With no revenue to collect, the remaining bureaucratic apparatus—lengthy ATF Form 4 or Form 1 processing, registration in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record, and criminal liability for possession of an unregistered item—suddenly appeared less like taxation and more like a direct restriction on the right to keep and bear arms.
Legal Challenges in the Fifth Circuit
The Fifth Circuit has become the primary judicial arena for testing these new realities. In United States v. Peterson, the court confronted a challenge to the NFA’s suppressor registration scheme head-on. After initially questioning whether suppressors qualify as protected “arms,” the panel ultimately assumed they do and analyzed the NFA under the framework established by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022). The court characterized the post-tax NFA process as a “shall-issue” licensing regime: applicants who are not prohibited persons and who meet objective criteria receive approval. Such objective, nondiscretionary systems, the Fifth Circuit reasoned, are presumptively constitutional because they mirror historical licensing traditions that merely verify lawful status rather than broadly disarm the public. The decision upheld the conviction but left the door open for future challenges focused on the practical burdens of the registration process itself.
Parallel litigation, including cases such as Jensen v. ATF and Roberts v. ATF originating in districts within the Fifth Circuit’s jurisdiction, presses further. Plaintiffs argue that once the tax vanishes, the registration requirement loses any plausible tie to an enumerated federal power and cannot survive Second Amendment review. They contend that suppressors and SBRs are in common use for lawful purposes—home defense, hunting, and recreational shooting—and that no Founding-era tradition supports a federal registry and approval process for such commonplace accessories. These suits seek not only declaratory relief but also injunctions blocking enforcement of the NFA’s registration mandates against compliant citizens.
The Fifth Circuit’s institutional stance on gun rights has amplified the significance of these proceedings. The court has previously demonstrated willingness to scrutinize ATF rulemaking. Post-tax-elimination cases now test whether the same rigorous historical-tradition analysis applies when the government defends a registration regime untethered from revenue collection.
Implications for Gun Owners and the Broader NFA
Critics of the NFA maintain that the registration process, even if formally “shall-issue,” imposes lengthy delays, subjective administrative hurdles, and felony risk that chill the exercise of Second Amendment rights. Proponents counter that background checks and serialization serve vital public-safety interests by preventing prohibited persons from acquiring these items. The Fifth Circuit’s decisions will likely turn on whether the government can identify a sufficiently analogous historical regulation—something more than general licensing of dangerous or unusual weapons—for accessories that enhance safety and utility rather than destructive capacity.
For gun owners, manufacturers, and retailers, the stakes are immediate. A ruling striking down or severely limiting NFA registration for SBRs and suppressors would dramatically expand access, lower costs, and normalize ownership of items once relegated to the fringes of federal oversight. It would also signal a potential sea change for the broader NFA framework, inviting challenges to other categories. Conversely, an affirmation of the registration regime as constitutional “shall-issue” licensing would preserve the status quo and reinforce the ATF’s gatekeeping role even absent the tax.
Conclusion
As these cases advance—potentially toward en banc review or Supreme Court consideration—the Fifth Circuit remains at the vanguard. Its analysis will shape not only the future of SBRs and suppressors but the very boundaries of federal authority over arms that millions of Americans regard as essential to self-defense and the pursuit of happiness. The elimination of the NFA tax has stripped away the old justification; the question now before the Fifth Circuit is whether the Constitution permits the regulatory shell to remain.
-
Louisiana 2026 Second Amendment Bills
Be sure to click the link to read the details.
Key Louisiana 2026 legislative proposals related to the Second Amendment (firearms rights, carry, storage, etc.) during the Regular Session (convened March 9, 2026).
Pro-Second Amendment / Rights-Expanding Bills
• HB 94 (Rep. McCormick): Enacts R.S. 14:95.11 to prohibit confiscation, seizure, taking, or transfer of firearms from law-abiding citizens without due process. Bars state/local entities from accepting federal funds/grants to enforce federal laws that would seize firearms without due process. Defines key terms (due process, firearm, law-abiding citizen) and sets penalties (fine up to $10,000, imprisonment up to 2 years, or both).
• HB 99 (Rep. McCormick): Would have allowed individuals 18+ lawfully permitted to possess firearms to carry on public or private college/university campuses receiving state funding. Removed colleges/universities from “school” definitions in firearm-free zone laws, with exceptions for certain restricted areas (e.g., federal law areas, disciplinary hearings, medical facilities, screened events). Included provisions limiting campus policies on registration/storage. Withdrawn by sponsor in March 2026.
• SB 277 (Sen. Edmonds): Expands concealed carry rights for additional statewide elected officials and assistants (e.g., governor, lieutenant governor, etc.) into the State Capitol, with qualification requirements. Passed Senate unanimously; advanced further.
Restrictive Bills (Mostly Defeated)
• HB 586 (storage mandate bill): Would have created criminal liability for failing to store firearms in a prescribed “one-size-fits-all” manner (mandatory storage to prevent access by minors/prohibited persons). Defeated in House Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice (6-3 vote) on April 28, 2026.
• SB 344 (Sen. Barrow): Would have created the crime of unsecured storage of firearms (with knowledge that a minor or prohibited person could access them), including penalties. Included language affirming it does not impair Second Amendment rights. Deferred/fails in Senate Judiciary C Committee.
Other Notes
• Louisiana has had constitutional/permitless carry since 2024; these bills build on or attempt to expand/restrict that framework.
• No major new constitutional amendments directly on Second Amendment issues appear to have advanced to the ballot from these proposals.
• Statuses can change; check the official Louisiana Legislature site for the latest on any bill.
These reflect the main publicly discussed Second Amendment-related filings and actions as of early May 2026. Pro-rights measures like HB 94 gained traction, while storage restrictions were blocked.